Public Nuisance

Random commentary and senseless acts of blogging.

The first Republican president once said, "While the people retain their virtue and their vigilance, no administration by any extreme of wickedness or folly can seriously injure the government in the short space of four years." If Mr. Lincoln could see what's happened in these last three-and-a-half years, he might hedge a little on that statement.
-Ronald Reagan

Left Bloggers
Blog critics

Gryffindor House
Roger Ailes
AintNoBadDude
Americablog
Amygdala
Angry Bear
Atrios
Billmon
Biscuit Report
Body and Soul
Corrente
Daily Kos
Demosthenes
Digby
Kevin Drum
Electrolite
Firedoglake
Glenn Greenwald
Group Think Central
Hamster
Inappropriate Response
Mark Kleiman
Lean Left
Nathan Newman
Nitpicker
Off the Kuff
Pandagon
Politus
Prometheus Speaks
Rittenhouse Review
Max Sawicky
Scoobie Davis
Seeing the Forest
Sideshow
Skippy
Sully Watch
Talking Dog
Talking Points
TPM Cafe
Tapped
Through the Looking Glass
Washington Monthly
WTF Is It Now?
Matt Yglesias

Slytherin House
Gideon
Indepundit/Lt Smash
OTB
Damian Penny
Natalie Solent
Andrew Sullivan
Tacitus
Eve Tushnet

Ravenclaw House
Balkinization
Michael Berube
Juan Cole
Cronaca
Crooked Timber
Decembrist
Brad Delong
Deltoid
Donkey Rising
Dan Drezner
Filibuster
Ideofact
OxBlog
Sandstorm
Amy Sullivan
Volokh Conspiracy
War and Piece
Winds of Change

House Elves
Tom Burka
Al Franken
Happy Fun Pundit
Mad Kane
Neal Pollack
Poor Man
Silflay Hraka
SK Bubba

Beth Jacob
Asparagirl
Gedankenpundit
Kesher Talk
Meryl Yourish

Prisoners of Azkaban
Antidotal
Ted Barlow
Beyond Corporate
William Burton
Cooped Up
Counterspin
Cogent Provacateur
Letter From Gotham
Likely Story
Limbaughtomy
Mind Over What Matters
Not Geniuses
Brian O'Connell
Rants in Our Pants
Ann Salisbury
Thomas Spencer
To the Barricades

Muggles
A & L Daily
Campaign Desk
Cursor
Daily Howler
Op Clambake
Media Matters
Spinsanity

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Party Animals:
Clark Community
From The Roots(DSCC)
Kicking Ass (DNC)
Stakeholder (DCCC)


Not a Fish
Ribbity Blog
Tal G


Baghdad Burning
Salam Pax

<< List
Jewish Bloggers
Join >>

Wednesday, June 25, 2003
 
Judicial Activism

The recent affirmative action decisions contained this statement by O'Connor, writing for the majority:

The requirement that all race-conscious admissions programs have a termination point “assure[s] all citizens that the deviation from the norm of equal treatment of all racial and ethnic groups is a temporary matter, a measure taken in the service of the goal of equality itself.”

We take the Law School at its word that it would “like nothing better than to find a race-neutral admissions formula” and will terminate its race-conscious admissions program as soon as practicable. It has been 25 years since Justice Powell first approved the use of race to further an interest in student body diversity in the context of public higher education. Since that time, the number of minority applicants with high grades and test scores has indeed increased. We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today.

This suggestion (also noted by Tapped) that affirmative action should be a temporary pracitice is uncontroversial. But Clarence Thomas made an interesting use of it in his dissent:

I agree with the Court's holding that racial discrimination in higher education admissions will be illegal in 25 years.

This statement takes some rather vague remarks by Justice O'Connor and labels them as what the language shows quite plainly they are not - a 'holding' that any form of affirmativbe action in college admissions will become impermissible in 25 years - and that that date is fixed and unchangable without regard to whether any progress towards racial equality in K - 12 education is made or even attempted in the intervening years. This deadline is in some ways reminiscent of the discussion of the first, second, and third trimesters in Roe v Wade, a discussion which conservatives regularly cite in charging that Roe v Wade was judicial overreach, sloppy reaosning, and legislating from the bench. But at least the trimester distinctions in Roe v Wade have some level of support in medical science; the 25 year rule that Thomas is creating here has no basis at all except for the fact that it is a round number, and that about 25 years have passed since the Bakke decision.

Justice Thomas, in order to further his own political agenda, has read language contrary to its plain meaning, has ruled gratuitously on a question not at issue, has endorsed a 'ruling' that was never made and, if made, could have no conceivable basis in any possible reading of the Constitution, has ignored the substantial legislative history indicating that numerous Congresses, including the Reconstruction Congress that originally drafted and passed the constitutional provisions under discussion, have supported some form of affirmative action, and has advocated the federal government managing how an entity of state government conducts its affairs. Conservatives used to have all sorts of nasty things to say about judges who did this, and usually less than this, to serve liberal ends, but don't hold your breath waiting for any criticism of judges who do the same to further conservative ends. So far Thomas has only been criticized, and that rather mildly, by Eugene Volokh, the most famously contrarian conservative/libertarian in blogdom.



Site 
Meter